House goes postal for one day - The Hill

The week of Aug. 16 was a unique week in two respects. Not only did the Democrats hold the first-ever all-virtual national political convention, but House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOvernight Defense: House panel probes Pompeo's convention speech | UN council rejects US demand to restore Iran sanctions | Court rules against Pentagon policy slowing expedited citizenship The Hill's Convention Report: GOP convention heads into second night | How Night One was received | NRCC chair predicts GOP will flip the House Pelosi calls Pompeo's convention address from Jerusalem 'appalling' MORE (D-Calif.) called the House back from its August recess for an emergency session on Saturday, Aug. 22, to consider the “Delivering for America Act” (which, fortunately, does not create another clever acronym). The purpose of the bill (H.R. 8015) is “to maintain prompt and reliable postal services during the COVID-19 health emergency.”

It came to light earlier in the month that the Postal Service was attempting to produce huge cost savings, in part by eliminating a large number of mail sorting machines and hundreds of blue mail drop boxes. Critics alleged the moves were causing massive delays in mail deliveries, though the pandemic slow-downs were also a contributing factor. Moreover, President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Memo: GOP seeks to detoxify Trump at convention Harris honors Women's Equality Day in op-ed, calls for voting reform Trump breaks with precedent on second night of convention MORE had previously publicly stated that he opposed election aid to the states and a postal bailout because that would only increase the number of mail-in ballots which he maintains leads to widespread vote fraud, although there is no evidence to support such claims.

On Aug.11, House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn MaloneyCarolyn Bosher MaloneyThe Hill's Convention Report: Trump rails on mail voting at surprise convention appearance | Republicans prepare for convention close-up | New York AG investigating Trump Org DeJoy defends Postal Service changes at combative House hearing Maloney threatens to subpoena postmaster general to produce information on agency reforms MORE (D-N.Y.) introduced the postal protection bill that was designed to restore Postal Service services and operations to the levels in effect on Jan. 1, 2020. The bill was not subject to committee hearings or a bill markup and report, nor did it have any co-sponsors. At the behest of the Democratic leadership, Rules Committee Chairman James McGovernJames (Jim) Patrick McGovernThe Hill Interview: Colombian President Duque calls for multilateral COVID-19 solutions House revives floor amendments The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Will Trump's plan to reopen the economy work? MORE (D-Mass.) called a committee hearing for Friday, Aug. 21, to consider a special rule for the bill. Meantime, a Rules Committee Print (116-61) was prepared that tweaked the two-page bill into a five-page measure, including the addition of a $25-billion supplemental appropriation previously requested by the Postal Service board of governors and included in the HEROES Act passed by the House in May, but still languishing in the Senate.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Friday Rules Committee hearing featured Chairwoman Maloney, her ranking minority committee member James ComerJames (Jamie) R. ComerDeJoy defends Postal Service changes at combative House hearing Postmaster general to reiterate Senate opening statement to House panel House passes B bill to boost Postal Service MORE (R-Ky.), Reps. Stephen LynchStephen Francis LynchCongress must enact a plan to keep government workers safe House committee requests hearing with postmaster general amid mail-in voting concerns House Democrats launch investigation into Trump administration's repeal of silencer export ban MORE (D-Mass.), and Michael BurgessMichael Clifton BurgessOvernight Health Care: Administration to require nursing homes test staff | Trump deadline for drug pricing order passes with no action | Africa eliminates polio in historic health win Overnight Health Care: Science inconclusive on use of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients | Fauci says Pence listens to him even though he's 'the skunk at the picnic' | First confirmed coronavirus reinfection found in Hong Kong, researchers say Overnight Health Care: New Ebola outbreak in Congo raises alarm | CDC director says teachers don't need 'critical' label MORE (R-Texas). Notwithstanding the paucity of witnesses, the hearing went on for about six-hours with a mix of speeches, lectures and questions. The majority pointed repeatedly to the toll late mail deliveries was taking on seniors receiving their medicines and benefit checks, and the potential distortions in election results if absentee ballots are not received on time. The minority downplayed any crisis and especially questioned the need for the $25 billion bailout since the Postal Service reportedly had $14 billion cash-on-hand that will fund the service through most of 2021, plus another $10 billion line-of-credit, if needed. Republicans asked how $25 billion was to be spent when no plan had been presented for its allocation.

One of the most troubling aspects of the rushed process was that the Democrats claimed there has not been time for a committee hearing and markup given the emergency nature of the situation, and yet the committee had scheduled a hearing with Postmaster General Louis DeJoyLouis DeJoyNew York leads group of states, cities filing lawsuit challenging Postal Service changes How private companies could step up to help save our election Who is the real loser in the USPS mess? MORE on Monday, Aug. 24, two days after the House was scheduled to act on the bill. (The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee did hear from DeJoy the day before the House vote.) DeJoy told the Senate committee Friday, and the House committee the following Monday, that while he would suspend the cost-cutting measures until after the election, he had no plans to restore the mail sorting machines and mailboxes already removed. He added that he did intend to honor the tradition of treating mail-in ballots the same as if they were first class mail to expedite their receipt by election officials.

The Rules Committee produced the anticipated no-amendment special rule on Friday. The rule self-executed the adoption of the Rules Committee print as a substitute, and included a motion to strike, agreed to by Maloney, a provision not in her introduced bill that would have allowed for “a private right of action” whereby “any person harmed by a violation of the act could bring a civil action against the Postal Service in an appropriate district court.” (There was no time for a Congressional Budget Office cost estimate on what the legal fees for that leadership-added right to sue might have cost).

The rule also waived points of order against the bill, including waiving a rule adopted by Democrats at the beginning of this Congress which bars consideration under a special rule of a bill that was not subject to a committee hearing or markup.

On Saturday, the House easily adopted the special rule and the previous question by identical party-line votes of 230 to 171, with 69 absent members voting by proxy voting –twice as many as voted by proxy in late July.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the bill itself, while the Republican motion to recommit to further amend the bill was rejected, 182 to 223 (with eight Democrats and no Republicans breaking ranks), the vote on final passage of the bill was 257 to 150, with all Democrats voting in favor along with 26 Republicans. Again, 69 proxy votes were cast, all but one of which were by Democrats, while 24 members (all Republicans) were listed as not voting.

What all that means is that only 336 and 338 members, respectively, out of 430 currently sitting members, were actually present and voting. The other 90 plus members boycotted the emergency session in favor of continuing with their August vacations, or at least socially long-distancing from the D.C. COVID-19 hotspot.

As the Washington Post reported on Sunday, “In bringing the House back to vote, Pelosi faced pressure from an increasing number of her Democratic colleagues to also consider legislation to restore unemployment benefits that expired last month.” Talks between the White House and congressional Democratic leaders broke down as Congress was leaving town at the end of July.

The White House indicated it was open to enacting a short-term, incremental fix, but Pelosi rejected any piecemeal approach –-at least, that is, until she scheduled action on the targeted postal bailout bill. Congress is not scheduled to return until Sept. 14, though more surprises could unfold in the interim.

Don Wolfensberger is a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the Bipartisan Policy Center, former staff director of the House Rules Committee, and author of “Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays.” The views expressed are solely his own.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

"House" - Google News
August 27, 2020 at 05:30AM
https://ift.tt/3b1q73W

House goes postal for one day - The Hill
"House" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2q5ay8k
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Bagikan Berita Ini