The House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman said Wednesday that John Bolton
John BoltonTrump allies throw jabs at Bolton over book's claims GOP confident of win on witnesses Giuliani calls Bolton a 'backstabber' over Ukraine allegations MORE first told his panel in September to examine the ouster of former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch
Marie YovanovitchLawyer says Parnas can't attend Senate trial due to ankle bracelet Giuliani calls Bolton a 'backstabber' over Ukraine allegations Parnas asks court for permission to turn over more evidence to Democrats MORE, suggesting that one of President Trump
Donald John TrumpCNN's Don Lemon explains handling of segment after Trump criticism NPR reporter after Pompeo clash: Journalists don't interview government officials to score 'political points' Lawyer says Parnas can't attend Senate trial due to ankle bracelet MORE’s top advisers tipped Congress off to the administration’s dealings with Kyiv.
Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel
Eliot Lance EngelHouse chairman says Pompeo agreed to testify on Iran Democrats offer mixed reactions to Trump's Mideast peace plan Trump to release Israeli-Palestinian peace plan on Tuesday MORE (D-N.Y.) said in a statement that he reached out to Bolton on Sept. 19, shortly after he departed from his post as Trump’s national security adviser.
“He and I spoke by telephone on September 23. On that call, Ambassador Bolton suggested to me — unprompted — that the committee look into the recall of Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch," Engel said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"He strongly implied that something improper had occurred around her removal as our top diplomat in Kyiv.”
Democrats have alleged that the motivation behind removing Yovanovitch — led by Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani
Rudy GiulianiLawyer says Parnas can't attend Senate trial due to ankle bracelet Perry delegation talking points stressed pushing Ukraine to deal with 'corruption' Giuliani calls Bolton a 'backstabber' over Ukraine allegations MORE and his associates — was a way to clear any obstacles the career diplomat may have presented as they sought to begin their pressure campaign in Ukraine.
The surprise statement from Engel comes after Trump asked Wednesday why Bolton had not raised his concerns earlier about Trump’s contacts with Ukraine.
The president's attacks on his former staffer came after The New York Times reported earlier this week that Bolton’s forthcoming memoir is expected to claim that Trump used $391 million in U.S. aid to Ukraine as leverage for two politically motivated investigations, sparking a roaring debate on Capitol Hill about calling Bolton to testify as part of the ongoing Senate impeachment trial.
“Why didn’t John Bolton complain about this 'nonsense' a long time ago, when he was very publicly terminated. He said, not that it matters, NOTHING!” Trump tweeted, adding that Bolton's "nasty & untrue book" contains "classified" material.
....many more mistakes of judgement, gets fired because frankly, if I listened to him, we would be in World War Six by now, and goes out and IMMEDIATELY writes a nasty & untrue book. All Classified National Security. Who would do this?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 29, 2020
ADVERTISEMENT
The White House is now formally trying to block the publication of Bolton's memoir.
Engel said he first chose to keep the conversation private, only sharing it with the three other committees spearheading the House impeachment investigation into allegations that Trump sought to pressure Ukraine into announcing probes that would have helped him in the 2020 election.
“At the time, I said nothing publicly about what was a private conversation, but because this detail was relevant to the Foreign Affairs, Intelligence, and Oversight [and Reform] Committees’ investigation into this matter, I informed my investigative colleagues,” Engel wrote. “It was one of the reasons we wished to hear from Ambassador Bolton, under oath, in a formal setting.”
His statement also comes in the midst of the Senate trial, as Democrats press Republicans to allow witnesses to be called before the upper chamber.
Democrats are particularly eager to hear from Bolton and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney
John (Mick) Michael MulvaneySenate Republicans to meet Tuesday afternoon on witness question Graham: There will be 51 GOP votes to call Bidens, whistleblower John Kelly: 'I believe John Bolton' MORE, both of whom have first hand knowledge of the Ukraine affair.
They believe these witnesses have information about the central charges Democrats have made against Trump: that he withheld vital funds — used to fight Russian-backed separatists — in order to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to commit to opening investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden
Joe BidenPerry delegation talking points stressed pushing Ukraine to deal with 'corruption' GOP senator airs anti-Biden ad in Iowa amid impeachment trial Biden photobombs live national news broadcast at one of his rallies MORE, a 2020 political rival, and Biden's son, as well as unfounded claims of Ukraine interfering in the 2016 presidential election.
Engel used the release of his statement to further push the need for Bolton to testify.
“Ambassador Bolton has made clear over the last few months that he has more to say on this issue. And now that the President has called his credibility into question, it’s important to set the record straight,” Engel added.
Before the start of the impeachment trial, Bolton publicly announced that he would be willing to testify if the GOP-controlled Senate subpoenaed him for testimony, a move that bolstered Democrats' demands for witnesses and that enhanced the spotlight on moderate Republicans who said they were undecided on the matter.
And since the leak of his unpublished book manuscript, the debate has grown even more heated.
ADVERTISEMENT
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
Addison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump allies throw jabs at Bolton over book's claims GOP confident of win on witnesses Collins Senate bid threatens to spark GOP rift in Georgia MORE (R-Ky.) has been against bringing in witnesses, arguing that the Democrats should not have rushed through their impeachment inquiry when they could’ve pursued such testimony in the House.
Democrats, meanwhile, have argued that the unprecedented effort by the White House to block witnesses — both current and former administration officials across all levels — hindered their ability to bring in these firsthand witnesses.
And they also note that Bolton, a long time supporter of executive privilege, made clear that he would challenge a subpoena from the House in court, which would tie up the matter for months, time that House Democrats say they did not have.
Republicans appear increasingly confident that they will be able to block new witnesses in a vote set for Friday.
—Updated at 2 p.m.
"House" - Google News
January 30, 2020 at 02:02AM
https://ift.tt/2O90ROC
House Foreign Affairs chairman says Bolton urged him in September to look into Yovanovitch ouster | TheHill - The Hill
"House" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2q5ay8k
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "House Foreign Affairs chairman says Bolton urged him in September to look into Yovanovitch ouster | TheHill - The Hill"
Post a Comment