Search

House panel advances bipartisan surprise billing legislation despite divisions | TheHill - The Hill

The House Education and Labor Committee on Tuesday approved a bill to protect patients from massive “surprise” medical bills, but not before a vigorous debate that showed the divides within both parties on the issue. 

The vote of 32-13 sent the measure to the full House. But competing proposals must be reconciled before the chamber can vote on the issue, which is a rare area of possible bipartisan action this year. 

In a sign of the unusual divisions on the issue, both committee Chairman Bobby ScottRobert (Bobby) Cortez ScottEx-HHS chief threatens to vote 'no' on surprise medical billing measure House approves pro-union labor bill Child care advocates press Congress to help families cope with costs MORE (D-Va.) and the top Republican on the panel, Rep. Virginia FoxxVirginia Ann FoxxEx-HHS chief threatens to vote 'no' on surprise medical billing measure Court ruling reignites ObamaCare fight for 2020 Democratic lawmaker tears into DeVos: You're 'out to destroy public education' MORE (R-N.C.), supported the bill, which would protect patients from getting bills for thousands of dollars when they go to the emergency room and one of their doctors happens to be outside their insurance network. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“This bill reflects a genuine compromise,” Scott said. “This approach is bipartisan and bicameral.”

But a bipartisan group of lawmakers opposed the measure, instead supporting a rival bill from the House Ways and Means Committee that is more favorable to doctors and hospitals, who have lobbied hard against the Education and Labor approach, worrying they would see damaging cuts to their payments under it. 

Reps. Donna ShalalaDonna Edna ShalalaOvernight Health Care — Presented by Partnership for America's Health Care Future — House committees unveil surprise billing legislation | US waiting for China to accept coronavirus help | Facebook vows to fight vaccine misinformation after child's death Ex-HHS chief threatens to vote 'no' on surprise medical billing measure 'Liberated' Pelosi bashes Trump — and woos Democratic base MORE (D-Fla.), Joe MorelleJoseph (Joe) MorelleDemocrats divided on surprise medical bill fix House panel delays vote on surprise medical bills legislation Push on 'surprise' medical bills hits new roadblocks MORE (D-N.Y.), Phil RoeDavid (Phil) Phillip RoeHouse passes bill to allow VA to fund service dogs for veterans with PTSD Juan Williams: Democrats can't let Trump off the hook GOP Rep. Phil Roe won't seek reelection MORE (R-Tenn.) and Kim SchrierKimberly (Kim) Merle SchrierGiffords gun reform group backs eight 'strong women' in House reelection bids The most expensive congressional races of the last decade The Hill's Morning Report - Vulnerable Dems are backing Trump impeachment MORE (D-Wash.) were among the lawmakers to rebel against the Education and Labor legislation. Roe and Schrier are doctors themselves and warned about its effects on doctors.  

Shalala called the bill “government rate-setting in the private sector,” and a “ham-handed attempt to bend the cost curve.”

Roe said the bill is not “consistent with the American spirit” because it had too much government intervention. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The dispute comes down how much the insurer will pay the doctor once the patient is taken out of the middle. 

The Education and Labor approach, which is also backed by the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Health Committee, would set the payment rate based on the median amount paid for that service in the geographic area, with the option of going to arbitration for some higher-cost bills. 

The rival Ways and Means approach, which is backed by doctor and hospital groups, would instead give the payment decisions to an outside arbiter. 

Unions and consumer group have backed the first approach, warning that the Ways and Means approach risks driving up health-care costs that would be passed on to consumers in the form of higher premiums. The White House also warned against the Ways and Means approach on Tuesday. 

“Arbitration just adds in another layer of administrative cost to our health care system,” said Rep. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalKey House Democrat says Perez must go: 'He doesn't lead on anything' Pramila Jayapal endorses Democrat Henry Cuellar's primary challenger The Democrats' dangerous unity gambit MORE (D-Wash.), the co-chairwoman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and a supporter of the Education and Labor bill. “We want the biggest savings for patients.” 

Let's block ads! (Why?)



"House" - Google News
February 12, 2020 at 03:01AM
https://ift.tt/38jPz2l

House panel advances bipartisan surprise billing legislation despite divisions | TheHill - The Hill
"House" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2q5ay8k
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update

Bagikan Berita Ini

0 Response to "House panel advances bipartisan surprise billing legislation despite divisions | TheHill - The Hill"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.